A backup or replacement site can be another data center site operated by the organization or mandated through a company that specializes in disaster recovery services. In some cases, one organization has entered into an agreement with a second organization to operate a common backup site. In addition, an organization may have a mutual agreement with another organization to establish a site in each of its data centers. What type of risk response is used when an Operational Risk Recovery Plan (ORD) contains a mutual agreement? There are obvious advantages for this type of arrangement. It allows an organization to get a risk treatment site at very low or no cost, thus creating an alternative treatment site, although a company may have very few financial resources to create one. Even if companies have very similar processing requirements – i.e. the same networked operating system, the same data reporting requirements, or the same transaction processing procedures – this type of agreement may be feasible. A mutual assistance agreement (sometimes called a mutual agreement) is an agreement with another company that might have similar IT requirements. The other company may have similar hardware or software configurations or requires the same network data communication or Internet access as your organization.
What is the best strategy for restoring hot, hot, mobile and cold sites in the data center compared to mutual agreements? As regards mutual agreements, care should be taken to ensure that the companies concerned are unlikely to be affected by the same disaster. For example, businesses in the immediate vicinity can all be affected by the same evacuation order, power outage, loss of telecommunications, flooding, etc. A mutual assistance agreement is used by two or more parties to provide assistance when one of the parties is in an emergency situation. Response described a business continuity plan. Answer b describes an assessment of harm and Response d describes risk reduction. The biggest mistake of this type of plan is obvious when we ask what will happen, if the disaster is big enough to affect both organizations. A major failure can easily disrupt both businesses and, as a result, wipe out any benefit this agreement could offer. The capacity and logistical elements of this type of plan make it seriously limited. What could be a major disadvantage for mutual aid or a type of mutual safeguard agreement? The correct answer is “mitigation”. A mutual agreement, where by which two organizations agree to provide each other with computing resources in the event of a disaster, is a form of risk reduction. This generally works well when both organizations have similar information processing bodies. Since the expected effect of mutual agreements is to have an operational DRP, this is a risk mitigation strategy.
A variation of the previously mentioned alternative sites is called multiple centers or two sites. In a multi-center concept, processing is distributed across multiple operations centers, creating a distributed approach to redundancy and sharing of available resources. . . .